Clinical heterogeneity in families with multiple cases of inborn errors of immunity.

BACKGROUND: Inborn errors of immunity (IEI) are a diverse range of genetic immune system illnesses affecting the innate and/or adaptive immune systems. Variable expressivity and incomplete penetrance have been reported in IEI patients with similar clinical diagnoses or even the same genetic mutation. METHODS: Among all recorded patients in the national IEI registry, 193 families with multiple cases have been recognized. Clinical, laboratory and genetic variability were compared between 451 patients with different IEI entities. RESULTS: The diagnosis of the first children led to the earlier diagnosis, lower diagnostic delay, timely treatment and improved survival in the second children in the majority of IEI. The highest discordance in familial lymphoproliferation, autoimmunity and malignancy were respectively observed in STK4 deficiency, DNMT3B deficiency and ATM deficiency. Regarding immunological heterogeneity within a unique family with multiple cases of IEI, the highest discordance in CD3+, CD4+, CD19+, IgM and IgA levels was observed in syndromic combined immunodeficiencies (CID), while non-syndromic CID particularly severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) manifested the highest discordance in IgG levels. Identification of the first ATM-deficient patient can lead to improved care and better survival in the next IEI children from the same family. CONCLUSION: Intrafamilial heterogeneity in immunological and/or clinical features could be observed in families with multiple cases of IEI indicating the indisputable role of appropriate treatment and preventive environmental factors besides specific gene mutations in the variable observed penetrance or expressivity of the disease. This also emphasizes the importance of implementing genetic evaluation in all members of a family with a history of IEI even if there is no suspicion of an underlying IEI as other factors besides the underlying genetic defects might cause a milder phenotype or delay in presentation of clinical features. Thus, affected patients could be timely diagnosed and treated, and their quality of life and survival would improve.

Evaluation of Specific Antibody Responses in Patients with Selective IgA Deficiency and Ataxia Telangiectasia.

BACKGROUND: Specific Antibody Deficiency (SAD) is a primary immunodeficiency disease (PID) characterized by the occurrence of recurrent infections and inadequate antibody response to polysaccharide new antigens. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine the titer of specific antibodies against unconjugated 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV-23), the presence of SAD, and its association with clinical and laboratory findings in Ataxia-telangiectasia (A-T) and selective immunoglobulin A deficiency (SIgAD) patients. METHODS: 32 A-T patients and 43 SIgAD patients were included in this cross-sectional study. Samples of the patients were obtained before and three weeks after vaccination with PPSV-23. Specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) directed towards pneumococcal capsular antigen and specific antibodies against whole pneumococcal antigens was measured. RESULTS: Comparison of the response to vaccination revealed that 81.3% of A-T patients and 18.6% of the SIgAD patients had an inadequate response to PPSV-23 (p<0.001). The prevalence of recurrent infection (p=0.034) and pneumonia (p=0.003) in SIgAD patients was significantly higher in non-responders than responders. Likewise, the number of marginal zone B cells (p=0.037), transitional B cells (p=0.019), plasmablasts (p=0.019), CD8+ naïve T cells (p=0.036), and percentage of CD8+ T cells (p=0.047), switched memory B cells (SMB) (p=0.026) and immunoglobulin M (IgM) memory B cells (p=0.022) in SIgAD patients were significantly lower in non-responder group than responder group. In contrast, the percentage of CD4 T+ cells in A-T patients was lower in the non-responder group than responders (p=0.035). CONCLUSION: SAD is more frequent in A-T patients than SIgAD patients. The role of SMB and T cells should not be underestimated in SAD.